Skip to content

Poché Pictures

  • Movies
  • YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Mary Cherry Chua (2023): A Ghost Story That Should’ve Stayed Buried

Mary Cherry Chua (2023): A Ghost Story That Should’ve Stayed Buried

Posted on November 13, 2025 By admin No Comments on Mary Cherry Chua (2023): A Ghost Story That Should’ve Stayed Buried
Reviews

The Legend Lives On… Unfortunately

There’s something genuinely thrilling about urban legends — the whispered stories about haunted campuses, cursed bridges, and bathroom spirits that fuel every Filipino kid’s nightmares. But every now and then, someone takes a perfectly creepy legend and turns it into a film so muddled that you start rooting for the ghost to just start over and haunt someone else.

Enter Mary Cherry Chua, Roni Benaid’s attempt at resurrecting one of the Philippines’ most infamous schoolyard tales: the tragic ghost of a beautiful girl raped and murdered by a janitor, doomed to roam her alma mater forever. The film could have been a chilling exploration of teenage obsession and trauma. Instead, it’s a 90-minute séance conducted by people who forgot to charge the Ouija board batteries.


The Setup: A School, A Spirit, and a Script That Needed Tutoring

We begin in the 1960s, when Mary Cherry Chua (Abby Bautista) reigns supreme over Regina Caeli Academy — the kind of old-money Catholic school where everyone’s hair looks like it was styled by divine intervention. She’s rich, she’s kind, she’s beloved… and she’s about to be horrifically murdered.

Her death is the stuff of urban legend: found lifeless on school grounds, her beauty stolen by violence, her spirit condemned to wander forever. It’s the perfect campfire story — except in this movie, it’s told with the energy of a substitute teacher reading a Wikipedia summary to half-asleep students.

Flash forward to 1995, when high schooler Karen (Ashley Diaz) — who has a passion for spooky stories and the investigative prowess of a bored librarian — decides to reopen Mary Cherry’s case. Because, you know, nothing bad ever happens to teenagers who dig up old curses.

Karen enlists her friends, including Paco (Kokoy De Santos, valiantly trying to act like he’s not in a completely different movie) and Faith (Lyca Gairanod, probably wondering how she got here). Together, they start snooping around the school, uncovering cryptic clues, and slowly realizing that they are — gasp! — being haunted by Mary Cherry Chua herself.

It’s a setup that promises chills. What it delivers instead is mild goosebumps and a burning desire to check your phone.


The Tone: Half Horror, Half After-School Special

The film wants to be The Grudge meets Veronica Mars, but it ends up as Scooby-Doo with Catholic guilt. Every scene feels like it’s building to a revelation, only for the characters to shrug and move on.

The “scary” moments are telegraphed from a mile away. You can practically hear the director whispering, “Cue creepy piano… now!” every time someone walks alone in a hallway. The jump scares are so predictable you start counting down to them like New Year’s Eve.

And then there’s the melodrama. Oh, the melodrama. Every emotional scene feels like it’s been reheated from a 2002 teleserye. Karen doesn’t just feel fear — she announces it, loudly, in dialogue that sounds like it was written by ChatGPT after watching Shake, Rattle & Roll on mute.


Ashley Diaz: Ghost Hunter, or Just Really Confused Student?

Let’s talk about Ashley Diaz, who makes her leading debut as Karen. She’s clearly trying her best — earnest, wide-eyed, and perpetually looking like she just remembered an overdue project. But she’s given so little to work with that her character becomes more plot device than person.

Karen is supposedly brave and curious, but most of her “investigating” involves wandering into dark rooms and whispering, “Mary Cherry Chua, are you there?” as if she’s ordering at a haunted Starbucks. By the third act, you start wishing she’d stop calling on the ghost and start calling for help.

Joko Diaz, as the janitor-slash-red-herring Mr. Manzano, lurks around looking suspicious enough to be guilty of something, though not necessarily murder. He’s the human equivalent of a thunderclap — loud, ominous, and weirdly misplaced. Alma Moreno and the rest of the adult cast pop in and out like they’re rehearsing for a school play they don’t quite understand.


The Horror: When the Ghost Is Scarier Offscreen

You’d think a story about a murdered girl haunting her school would be a slam dunk for atmosphere. Dim hallways? Check. Creepy mirrors? Check. A tragic backstory ripe for commentary on misogyny and violence? Double check.

And yet, Mary Cherry Chua somehow makes the supernatural feel… boring.

The ghost herself, for instance, appears sporadically, often lit like a department store mannequin having an existential crisis. She floats, she screams, she makes things flicker — all the standard ghost stuff. But she’s never actually scary. She’s too polite. You get the sense that if you bumped into her in the restroom, she’d apologize and hand you a tissue.

Even the big reveal — who killed Mary Cherry Chua, and why — lands with all the impact of a damp exam paper. The film treats its twist like it’s Seven, but it’s really more like Scooby-Doo: The Purity Edition.


The Pacing: Detention-Worthy

The movie moves slower than a Catholic school line at confession. Scenes drag on long after the tension’s gone, filled with awkward pauses and exposition dumps that could sedate a poltergeist.

By the time the third act rolls around, you’ve seen enough candlelit corridors and gasping close-ups to last a lifetime. You’re less scared of the ghost and more afraid the credits will never roll.


Missed Potential: The Legend Deserved Better

And that’s the tragedy here — not Mary Cherry’s murder, but the wasted potential. The real urban legend is iconic, whispered in classrooms and corridors across the Philippines for decades. It’s got everything: beauty, tragedy, injustice, and supernatural vengeance.

But instead of using that legend to explore anything meaningful — say, how women’s trauma is sensationalized, or how truth gets distorted into myth — the film settles for surface-level spooks and soapy dramatics.

There’s even a subplot hinting at class inequality and institutional corruption, but it’s so thinly developed you’d miss it if you blinked. The movie flirts with ideas it doesn’t have the guts (or attention span) to commit to.


The Aesthetic: A Ghost Story Shot Like a Music Video

If there’s one compliment to be given, it’s that Mary Cherry Chua looks great — in that overlit, Instagram-filtered way where every frame feels two edits away from a beauty ad.

The production design captures the eerie nostalgia of old schools — the polished floors, the crucifixes, the smell of repression in the air. Unfortunately, the cinematography can’t decide whether it’s horror or teen drama. Half the shots look like they belong in a shampoo commercial for haunted hair.


The Ending: Justice, Sort Of, Maybe

The movie ends, predictably, with Karen realizing that Mary Cherry’s spirit just wanted justice. Cue tears, forgiveness, and one last ghostly smile before she drifts into the afterlife like she’s late for a Sanrio commercial.

It’s meant to be touching. Instead, it feels like the movie is finally apologizing to us for wasting our time.


The Final Bell: Haunted by Mediocrity

In the end, Mary Cherry Chua isn’t bad because it’s cheap or campy — it’s bad because it plays everything safe. It’s a horror film that’s terrified of being truly horrifying. It has a rich legend to draw from, a capable cast, and a premise tailor-made for creepiness, but it wastes it all on tired clichés, flat scares, and dialogue so stiff it could exorcise itself.

It’s the cinematic equivalent of a ghost story told by your least imaginative classmate — repetitive, predictable, and way too long.

Rating: 3/10 — A haunting that never quite shows up. If you want to honor the legend of Mary Cherry Chua, you’re better off reading it online… with the lights off.

You said:


Post Views: 33

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Mallari (2023): Three Generations of Madness, One Endless Headache
Next Post: Nefarious (2023): When Possession Turns Into a Sermon with Lighting Cues ❯

You may also like

Reviews
Whispers in the Dark (1992) – Sciorra, Unger, and the Most Dangerous Therapy Session in Manhattan
August 1, 2025
Reviews
Solstice (2007)
October 4, 2025
Reviews
History of the Occult (2020) Conspiracy, coven, and cursed TV
November 9, 2025
Reviews
“Seven in Heaven” — A Teenage Party Game Becomes an Existential Crisis (and It’s Weirdly Fun)
November 7, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dark. Raw. Unfiltered. Independent horror for the real ones. $12.99/month.

CLICK HERE TO BROWSE THE FILMS

Recent Posts

  • New Life (2023): A Zombie Movie That Should Have Stayed in Quarantine
  • Nefarious (2023): When Possession Turns Into a Sermon with Lighting Cues
  • Mary Cherry Chua (2023): A Ghost Story That Should’ve Stayed Buried
  • Mallari (2023): Three Generations of Madness, One Endless Headache
  • Late Night with the Devil (2023): The Devil Gets Top Billing, and the Ratings Have Never Been Better

Categories

  • Behind The Scenes
  • Character Actors
  • Death Wishes
  • Follow The White Rabbit
  • Here Lies Bud
  • Hollywood "News"
  • Movies
  • Philosophy & Poetry
  • Reviews
  • Scream Queens & Their Directors
  • Uncategorized
  • Zap aka The Wicked
  • Zoe Dies In The End
  • Zombie Chicks

Copyright © 2025 Poché Pictures.

Theme: Oceanly News Dark by ScriptsTown