Skip to content

Poché Pictures

  • Movies
  • YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • The Messenger (2015): Ghosts, Guilt, and a Movie That Refuses to Pass On

The Messenger (2015): Ghosts, Guilt, and a Movie That Refuses to Pass On

Posted on October 30, 2025 By admin No Comments on The Messenger (2015): Ghosts, Guilt, and a Movie That Refuses to Pass On
Reviews

When Ghosts Talk Too Much

If you’ve ever watched The Sixth Sense and thought, “This would be better if it were British, drunk, and somehow dull,” then congratulations — The Messenger is your movie. Directed by David Blair, it stars Robert Sheehan, Lily Cole, and a collection of confused specters who look like they took a wrong turn on their way to Casper.

It’s a supernatural mystery horror film that manages to be none of those things. There’s mystery, sure, but mostly about why the script exists. There’s horror, if you count the pacing. And “supernatural” only in the sense that it requires a higher power to sit through it without hitting fast-forward.


Plot: A Man, His Ghosts, and Too Many Flashbacks

Our story follows Jack (Robert Sheehan), a man who can see dead people — yes, that old chestnut — ever since his father hung himself when Jack was a kid. The trauma supposedly unlocked his ability to talk to souls that haven’t yet “gone into the light,” which sounds deep until you realize the film’s version of “the light” might just be the cinema exit sign.

Jack’s job as an unwilling messenger is to deliver these spirits’ final words to the living. The result? Social disaster. Every time he tries, the living react with confusion, anger, or violence — pretty much how most audiences react to this movie.

He spends his days drinking, muttering to himself, and trying to get ghosts off his back, which makes him the least glamorous medium since Whoopi Goldberg in Ghost. His latest haunting comes from Mark (Jack Fox), a dead journalist who insists he was murdered and needs Jack to tell his pregnant wife, Sarah (Tamzin Merchant), that he loves her — and that he knows the baby isn’t his. Because nothing screams “closure” like spectral paternity drama.

Jack delivers the message, naturally making everything worse, and ends up in custody. The police assume he’s insane, the psychiatrist assumes he’s insane, and the audience assumes the same about whoever financed this thing.


Robert Sheehan: A Ghost of Better Roles

Robert Sheehan (Misfits, The Umbrella Academy) is a talented actor — funny, charismatic, and full of energy. Which is exactly why it’s so jarring to see him trapped in a movie that feels like it’s been tranquilized.

His Jack is supposed to be tortured, but mostly he looks hungover. Every time he sees a ghost, he reacts less like he’s terrified and more like someone just asked him for bus fare. His constant drinking and muttering come across less as symptoms of trauma and more as what happens when an actor realizes he’s stuck in a script that gives him nothing to do.

He spends a large portion of the movie shouting at thin air, which might have been interesting if the dialogue wasn’t written like a bad therapy pamphlet.


Lily Cole: Ethereal, Aloof, and Possibly in a Different Movie

Lily Cole plays Emma, Jack’s sister, who oscillates between concern and blank confusion. She’s the movie’s emotional anchor, which is like being the designated driver at a séance — well-intentioned, but completely out of her depth.

She tries to help Jack, but her scenes feel disconnected, as if filmed on another planet. Every time she appears, the tone shifts from “bleak ghost drama” to “experimental art film about hair products.”

In one of the movie’s big revelations, Emma discovers that her son Billy also sees ghosts. The film treats this as a shocking twist, though by this point the only shocking thing is how long it’s taken to end.


The Ghosts: Talkative Yet Forgettable

The spirits haunting Jack aren’t scary, sad, or mysterious — they’re just annoying. They appear randomly, deliver cryptic exposition, and vanish like bad Wi-Fi connections.

Mark, the dead journalist, is the most talkative of the bunch. He’s handsome, smug, and dead — basically your average media personality. His murder subplot could’ve been interesting, but it’s buried under so much emotional handwringing that by the time Jack figures anything out, you’ve stopped caring.

And then there’s the final ghost — a drowned child connected to Jack’s nephew. It’s supposed to be chilling, but it lands somewhere between confusing and please stop showing me more plot threads, we’re full.


The Horror: Ghostly in Name Only

Calling The Messenger a “horror movie” is like calling a lukewarm cup of tea “a boiling cauldron of fear.” It’s atmospheric, sure — in the way fog is atmospheric. Nothing happens.

The scares are mostly people standing in dim lighting while strings play nervously in the background. The ghosts appear without warning but also without purpose, their translucent faces bathed in melancholy and poor CGI.

There are no jumps, no tension, and no genuine dread — just long stretches of people whispering about grief and unresolved trauma. It’s less The Conjuring and more The Counseling.


The Script: A Séance Written by a Sleep-Deprived Philosopher

Andrew Kirk’s script is one of those “deep” screenplays that mistake repetition for meaning. Every conversation circles back to grief, redemption, or the afterlife, but never actually says anything.

The dialogue is full of lines like:

“You don’t choose to be the messenger, Jack. The message chooses you.”

and

“The dead speak through the living, but sometimes the living just stop listening.”

It’s the kind of writing that sounds profound in a trailer but collapses under daylight. You can practically hear the echo of film school monologues in every scene.

Even the psychiatrist, played by Joely Richardson, seems exhausted by the script. She sits through Jack’s ramblings with the blank stare of someone calculating how many minutes are left in her contract.


Direction: All Fog, No Fire

David Blair directs the film as if he’s allergic to momentum. Every scene drags. Every emotional beat gets three extra close-ups. Every flashback interrupts the present just when something vaguely interesting might happen.

The cinematography tries to be poetic, with muted colors and slow pans across gravestones, but it ends up looking like a perfume commercial shot in purgatory.

The editing is equally lifeless. The movie’s rhythm feels like it’s been edited by an actual ghost — invisible, slow, and mostly disinterested.


The Ending: The Message Is “We’re Out of Ideas”

After nearly two hours of gloom, Jack finally accepts that his powers are real (or maybe not; the movie’s never sure). He cries, makes peace with his dead father, and probably wonders if the sequel will have a better script.

The final twist — that Jack’s nephew Billy also sees ghosts — is supposed to be haunting, but it just sets up a spin-off nobody asked for. It’s like ending a bad meal by handing the diner a coupon for another one.


Dark Humor: Because Someone Has To Laugh

There’s a perverse sort of comedy running through The Messenger. Jack keeps trying to help people, and every time, it ends with him getting punched, arrested, or institutionalized. It’s less tragic and more slapstick if you think about it.

The ghosts, meanwhile, are terrible clients. They demand closure, lie about the details, and ruin his life in the process — basically customer service representatives from the afterlife.

And then there’s the symbolism — endless gravestones, flickering lights, dead birds. You start to suspect even the props are depressed.


Final Verdict: Ghosted by Its Own Story

The Messenger wants to be a meditation on grief and the thin veil between life and death. Instead, it’s a séance with no spirit, a ghost story that forgot to be haunting.

Robert Sheehan does his best, but the movie around him is so dreary it could haunt Ambien. By the time the credits roll, you’ll be begging for your own light to “move into.”

Rating: ★★☆☆☆ (2/5)
The only message here is: don’t watch this sober.


Post Views: 238

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Mantra 2 (2015): When Ghosts Have Better Exit Strategies Than the Audience
Next Post: Most Likely to Die (2015): Most Likely to Bore, Confuse, and Waste 90 Minutes of Your Life ❯

You may also like

Reviews
Carnifex
November 10, 2025
Reviews
Mosquito (1994) – A Bloodsucker of a Movie, and Not in the Way You’d Hope
July 12, 2025
Reviews
The Final Terror (1983): When Rachel Ward Meets Mother Nature’s Psychopath
August 23, 2025
Reviews
The Zodiac (2005)
October 1, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dark. Raw. Unfiltered. Independent horror for the real ones. $12.99/month.

CLICK HERE TO BROWSE THE FILMS

Recent Posts

  • Traci Lords – The Girl Who Wouldn’t Stay Buried
  • Rhonda Fleming — The Queen of Technicolor
  • Ethel Fleming — The Surf Girl Who Wouldn’t Drown
  • Alice Fleming — Grandeur in the Margins of the Frame
  • Maureen Flannigan — The Girl Who Could Freeze Time and Then Kept Moving

Categories

  • Behind The Scenes
  • Character Actors
  • Death Wishes
  • Follow The White Rabbit
  • Hollywood "News"
  • Last Night Alive
  • Movies
  • Old Time Wrestlers
  • Philosophy & Poetry
  • Present Day Wrestlers (Male)
  • Pro Wrestling History & News
  • Reviews
  • Scream Queens & Their Directors
  • Uncategorized
  • Women's Wrestling
  • Wrestling News
  • Zap aka The Wicked
  • Zoe Dies In The End
  • Zombie Chicks

Copyright © 2025 Poché Pictures. Image Disclaimer: Some images on this website may be AI-generated artistic interpretations used for editorial purposes. Real photographs taken by Poche Pictures or collaborating photographers are clearly identifiable and used with permission.

Theme: Oceanly News Dark by ScriptsTown