Skip to content

Poché Pictures

  • Movies
  • YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Shut In (2016): A Thriller So Dull You’ll Wish You Were in a Coma Too

Shut In (2016): A Thriller So Dull You’ll Wish You Were in a Coma Too

Posted on November 2, 2025 By admin No Comments on Shut In (2016): A Thriller So Dull You’ll Wish You Were in a Coma Too
Reviews

Welcome to Maine, Population: Bad Decisions

If you’ve ever wanted to watch Naomi Watts argue with her house, Shut In (2016) is the movie for you. Directed by Farren Blackburn and written by Christina Hodson, this supposed “psychological horror thriller” feels like someone tried to remake Misery, The Sixth Sense, and Misunderstood Pharmaceutical Ads all at once — and somehow forgot to include suspense.

It’s the kind of movie that makes you say, “Oh no, something’s wrong,” not because you’re scared, but because you realize you’ve got 45 minutes left.


The Setup: Mommy Dearest, But Make It Bland

Naomi Watts plays Mary Portman, a child psychologist living in a remote Maine mansion so big it makes The Shining’s Overlook Hotel look cozy. Her husband and stepson get into a car accident — hubby dies, and stepson Stephen (Charlie Heaton) ends up in a vegetative state. Cue six months of Mary spoon-feeding him soup, staring out windows, and looking perpetually one Xanax away from a nap.

Mary’s guilt and isolation should be fertile ground for tension. Instead, it’s like watching someone slowly remember they left the oven on. Even the supposedly “haunted” house seems tired — creaky floorboards, flickering lights, and a phone that drops calls as if it’s emotionally overwhelmed too.

Then a subplot about a deaf-mute child named Tom (played by Jacob Tremblay, who must’ve lost a bet) drops in. Tom disappears, reappears, disappears again, and somehow manages to be both the most interesting and least used character in the film.


The Atmosphere: New England Gothic, Sponsored by NyQuil

Let’s talk tone. Shut In is marketed as a psychological thriller, but it plays more like a $5 DVD you find in a gas station bin labeled “Discount Suspense.”

The cinematography tries to channel chilly New England vibes — snow, ice, loneliness — but ends up looking like a Canadian insurance commercial. Every frame is so dimly lit that you’ll start fiddling with your TV brightness, assuming it’s your fault the movie looks like it’s been shot through a wet sock.

The soundtrack doesn’t help. It’s just orchestral “BONG” sounds every time someone walks into a dark room. I counted eight false scares involving shadows, reflections, or Naomi Watts reacting to furniture. By the halfway point, I was rooting for the furniture.


The Plot Twist: Gaslight, Gatekeep, Vegetative Boyboss

The movie’s “big reveal” is that Stephen — her supposedly brain-dead stepson — isn’t actually in a coma. He’s been faking it. For six months.

That’s right. Charlie Heaton, bless him, spent half the movie pretending to be paralyzed only to reveal he’s secretly been slipping his stepmom sedatives, murdering side characters, and crawling around the house like a Spider-Man villain with mommy issues.

This twist lands with all the subtlety of a piano falling down stairs. It’s supposed to make us gasp, but instead it makes us question whether Mary has ever noticed her grocery bill going up or her shampoo mysteriously moving. The reveal comes off less “shocking psychological turn” and more “episode of Scooby-Doo where the villain’s plan makes no sense.”

Heaton tries his best, but he’s stuck in a role that demands he switch from “inert vegetable” to “incel Norman Bates” in under ten minutes. He looks less menacing and more like he’s trying to remember his lines while enduring a bad contact lens.


Naomi Watts: A Professional Suffering Enthusiast

Let’s take a moment to salute Naomi Watts, the hardest-working woman in horror mediocrity. Between The Ring, Funny Games, Dream House, and now Shut In, she’s built an entire career on looking distressed in well-furnished houses.

She spends most of this movie in pajamas, whispering “Stephen?” into hallways like she’s auditioning for a sleep aid commercial. When the script requires her to cry, she gives it her all — but even her tears look like they’re wondering if this paycheck was worth it.

Her chemistry with Jacob Tremblay is genuinely sweet, but the film quickly ditches that relationship in favor of long stretches of her wandering around whispering to ghosts that aren’t there. It’s like The Others if the “others” were the audience’s patience.


Supporting Cast: Blink and You’ll Miss Them (Unless You Fell Asleep First)

Oliver Platt shows up as Dr. Wilson, Mary’s therapist, phoning in his performance so hard it might’ve been filmed via actual phone. He delivers every line like he’s reading it off a grocery list. David Cubitt plays Doug, the potential love interest who exists solely to die, while Clémentine Poidatz as Mary’s assistant pops up to remind us that there are indeed other humans in this universe.

And then there’s Jacob Tremblay, who somehow manages to look dignified even while hiding in crawlspaces from a teenager with serious Oedipal issues. If this movie proves anything, it’s that Tremblay is too good for Earth — or at least for EuropaCorp’s horror division.


The Science of Stupid

Stephen’s plan — if you can call it that — involves faking paralysis, secretly drugging his stepmother, killing her coworkers, trapping her in a bathtub, and whispering things like “We were happy before Tom came” as if this were a Nicholas Sparks novel directed by Ed Gein.

At one point, he literally bathes her while she’s tied up, a scene so uncomfortably awkward it feels like it was written by an AI that misread Psycho. The movie tries to pass this off as a psychological study of obsession, but it’s really just ten minutes of Naomi Watts trying not to look like she’s regretting her agent’s life choices.


The Ice Storm of Inconvenience

The climax — if you can call it that — takes place during an ice storm that’s apparently been brewing for three acts. The blizzard is mostly used as an excuse to keep characters trapped indoors, because heaven forbid anyone actually leaves the house and ends the movie early.

Stephen, now fully villain-coded, nails the doors shut, kills more people, and chases Naomi and little Tom into the basement. There’s a hammer, some screaming, and a frozen lake sequence that might have been exciting if the CGI didn’t look like a screensaver.

Mary finally kills Stephen with a hammer blow, proving once again that even in horror movies, DIY tools are more reliable than the police.


The Ending: Shut Off

In the final moments, Mary and Tom move on with their lives, presumably to a warmer climate and better-written scripts. But by then, the damage is done — and not just to the characters. To the viewer, too.

The movie tries to end on a note of catharsis, but all it really achieves is mild relief. It’s as if the film itself finally sighed, “You can go now.”


The Horror: Watching the Runtime Tick Down

The true terror of Shut In isn’t the violence, or the twist, or even Charlie Heaton’s bath-time monologue. It’s the overwhelming sense of meh. The film isn’t bad enough to be funny or good enough to be scary. It just exists, like that one relative at Thanksgiving who keeps talking about their job in “tech.”

It’s a thriller where the thrills are sedated, the scares are outsourced, and the pacing feels like it’s stuck in rush-hour traffic. By the time the credits roll, you won’t be scared — you’ll just feel emotionally “shut in” yourself.


Final Thoughts: Please, Let Me Out

Shut In is what happens when someone makes a horror movie with all the right ingredients but no heat. It’s slow, predictable, and about as suspenseful as a Hallmark Christmas special starring ghosts.

Naomi Watts tries, Charlie Heaton twitches, and Jacob Tremblay hides in small spaces like he’s trying to escape the movie itself — and honestly, we can’t blame him.


Verdict:
⭐️½ out of 5.
A psychological thriller so limp it needs therapy. The only thing truly terrifying is how long it feels.

If Hitchcock were alive to see this, he’d fake a coma too.


Post Views: 130

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Sharkansas Women’s Prison Massacre (2016): Sharks, Swamps, and Shenanigans — The B-Movie Buffet You Didn’t Know You Needed
Next Post: SiREN (2016): Love, Lust, and Literal Man-Eating — A Bachelor Party to Die For ❯

You may also like

Reviews
The Dead Inside (2013): When Even the Zombies Look Bored
October 19, 2025
Reviews
The Bride (2017): A Horror Film That Makes You Question Your Own Life Choices… and Your Taste in Movies
November 2, 2025
Reviews
Antrum (2018): The Deadliest Film You’ll Love to Die Watching
November 3, 2025
Reviews
Black X-Mas (2006): All I Want for Christmas Is a Better Movie
October 1, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dark. Raw. Unfiltered. Independent horror for the real ones. $12.99/month.

CLICK HERE TO BROWSE THE FILMS

Recent Posts

  • Traci Lords – The Girl Who Wouldn’t Stay Buried
  • Rhonda Fleming — The Queen of Technicolor
  • Ethel Fleming — The Surf Girl Who Wouldn’t Drown
  • Alice Fleming — Grandeur in the Margins of the Frame
  • Maureen Flannigan — The Girl Who Could Freeze Time and Then Kept Moving

Categories

  • Behind The Scenes
  • Character Actors
  • Death Wishes
  • Follow The White Rabbit
  • Here Lies Bud
  • Hollywood "News"
  • Movies
  • Old Time Wrestlers
  • Philosophy & Poetry
  • Present Day Wrestlers (Male)
  • Pro Wrestling History & News
  • Reviews
  • Scream Queens & Their Directors
  • Uncategorized
  • Women's Wrestling
  • Wrestling News
  • Zap aka The Wicked
  • Zoe Dies In The End
  • Zombie Chicks

Copyright © 2025 Poché Pictures. Image Disclaimer: Some images on this website may be AI-generated artistic interpretations used for editorial purposes. Real photographs taken by Poche Pictures or collaborating photographers are clearly identifiable and used with permission.

Theme: Oceanly News Dark by ScriptsTown