Skip to content

Poché Pictures

  • Movies
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Valley Girl (1983): Like, Totally Overrated — A Time Capsule That Should Have Stayed Buried

Valley Girl (1983): Like, Totally Overrated — A Time Capsule That Should Have Stayed Buried

Posted on June 19, 2025 By admin No Comments on Valley Girl (1983): Like, Totally Overrated — A Time Capsule That Should Have Stayed Buried
Reviews

“A love story between a bland Romeo and a bimbo Juliet, set to a mixtape of mall fashion, vacant stares, and the whimper of wasted potential.”

There’s a subset of ’80s films that people remember with nostalgic affection. Not because they were good, but because they were there — flickering on cable TV, featured on VHS covers in dusty Blockbusters, or quoted in the background of high school locker rooms. Valley Girl is one of those movies. It lives on as an emblem of teased hair, neon clothes, and teen angst as filtered through a suburban blender. And while it’s garnered something of a cult status over the years, let’s stop pretending this movie is anything other than what it is: shallow, overrated, and mostly forgettable.

Sure, it gave us a baby-faced Nicolas Cage and a soundtrack full of New Wave nuggets. But under the dated aesthetic lies a script as flimsy as a love note scribbled on a Trapper Keeper. Valley Girl isn’t charming — it’s aimless. It isn’t a biting satire — it’s a watered-down Romeo and Juliet knockoff painted with lip gloss and adolescent clichés.

Let’s break it down — painfully, methodically, and with a deep sigh — because Valley Girl deserves more honest retrospection than breathless nostalgia.


The Plot: Shakespeare This Ain’t

Julie (Deborah Foreman) is a pretty, popular girl from the San Fernando Valley, with an accent thick enough to choke a Cabbage Patch Kid. She has a picture-perfect high school life — vapid friends, a Ken-doll boyfriend named Tommy (Michael Bowen), and endless afternoons of shopping and beach time. But she’s starting to feel… like, totally bored.

Enter Randy (Nicolas Cage), a Hollywood punk with a bad haircut and an even worse attitude. He crashes a Valley party, locks eyes with Julie, and within minutes they’re making out in a bathroom. And just like that, the movie becomes a half-hearted tug-of-war between conformity and rebellion, with Julie caught between her lame but socially acceptable boyfriend and this moody outsider who talks like a burnout and looks like a lost roadie for The Cure.

The conflict? Julie’s friends think Randy is “grody.” Her parents, ironically, are the most laid-back characters in the film and don’t care. Randy, meanwhile, keeps popping up like a stray dog with a mixtape — crashing parties, hiding in her car, and generally moping around until Julie finally gives in.

There’s no real sense of stakes. No one’s life changes. No grand transformation occurs. Julie dumps the jerk, dates the moody guy, dumps him, and then goes back to him after a pathetic prom showdown. The End.

If this is a “timeless love story,” then I’m a Go-Go.


The Characters: Vacant Eyes and Valley Lies

Let’s start with Julie — our leading lady. Deborah Foreman is undeniably adorable in that girl-next-door, preppy kind of way. She brings a kind of reluctant warmth to her role, and if she’d been given more than “Ugh, I like totally don’t know what to do” to work with, she might have shined. But the script confines her to a cycle of pouting, blinking, and asking for permission from her snotty friends.

Julie has no discernible interests beyond picking a boyfriend and debating whether her hair looks good. She’s not rebellious. She’s not curious. She’s a follower looking for permission to be with someone slightly different. It’s hardly inspirational.

Now let’s talk about Randy.

Ah, young Nicolas Cage — raw, bug-eyed, already experimenting with his patented brand of twitchy intensity. He tries hard. He tries very hard. And there are moments where his weirdness almost cuts through the monotony, like a knife through dry toast. But the truth is, his character doesn’t make sense. Randy is supposed to be this edgy, alternative guy — but he doesn’t do anything edgy. He listens to the same music, hangs out with the same boring dudes, and spends most of the movie begging Julie to take him back.

It’s hard to root for a character whose entire arc consists of “mope, stalk, repeat.”

The supporting characters are even worse. Julie’s Valley girl friends are indistinguishable — a cacophony of giggles, gum-smacking, and whiny opinions. Tommy, the preppy ex, is a cartoon villain with hair sprayed straight from Satan’s salon. Nobody grows. Nobody learns anything. They all talk like they’re trying to get through a Clueless audition with head trauma.


Dialogue: Like, Totally Gag Me

The Valley-speak was novel for about five minutes. After that, it becomes a shrill echo chamber of “like,” “totally,” “gag me,” “grody,” “fer sure,” and other verbal crimes against humanity. And yes, it was meant to capture a time and place, but let’s not confuse annoying mimicry for authenticity.

There’s a difference between stylized dialogue (Heathers, Clueless, even Mean Girls) and this mess. In Valley Girl, the speech patterns become a cage. Every conversation feels like it was written by a bored teenager armed with a thesaurus of 1983 slang. It’s all surface, no substance.

Randy’s dialogue doesn’t help. He’s supposed to be the soulful alternative — the one with deeper thoughts and artistic tendencies. But his lines are either bland platitudes or clunky attempts at sounding deep. At one point, he hides in Julie’s shower to win her back. Romantic? No. Creepy? Yes. And no, the movie doesn’t see the problem.


Direction and Visuals: Flat and Functional

Director Martha Coolidge doesn’t exactly bring visual flair to the project. To her credit, the pacing is brisk — the film is mercifully short — but it’s shot like a TV movie, with flat lighting and uninspired compositions. There’s little sense of mood or energy beyond the bright fashion and loud music.

The film’s aesthetic is often mistaken for intentional stylization — but let’s be real. It looks cheap. The sets are plain. The party scenes are awkward. The romantic montages are barely distinguishable from soft drink commercials of the same era.

There’s one rooftop scene between Julie and Randy that’s almost charming, thanks to Cage’s oddball sincerity. But most of the film’s visual moments are forgettable. No wonder everyone just remembers the soundtrack.


The Soundtrack: The One Thing It Got Right

Okay, let’s give credit where it’s due. The Valley Girl soundtrack is a banger. With bands like The Plimsouls, Modern English, and Men at Work, the film captures the pulse of early ‘80s New Wave. “A Million Miles Away” is a highlight, and it underscores one of the few genuinely emotional moments in the film.

The music does a lot of the heavy lifting. It provides texture where the script fails, energy where the characters lack it. It’s the film’s one authentic, lasting contribution to pop culture. And the fact that the original home release didn’t secure all the rights to the music was a crime against nostalgia.

So yes — the soundtrack is a bop. But a killer mixtape can’t save a shallow romance.


Gender Politics and Yikes Moments

Watching Valley Girl in 2025 is a slightly uncomfortable experience — not just because of the slang, but because of the way women are portrayed. Julie is treated like a prize to be fought over. Her friends mock her for not choosing the “right” guy. Her ex literally pressures her into sex, and it’s played for laughs. Randy’s behavior borders on harassment at times, but it’s brushed off as passionate devotion.

It’s a relic of a time when stalking was romantic, emotional manipulation was charming, and female characters existed solely to react to the whims of their male suitors. Some might argue it’s a product of its time — but time doesn’t excuse lazy writing or paper-thin characterization.

Even the adults are absurd. Julie’s hippie parents are cartoon cutouts who offer no real guidance or insight. They exist to say things like “just follow your heart” while the entire plot unravels in teenage tantrums.


So Why Do People Remember It Fondly?

Nostalgia, plain and simple. For many, Valley Girl was a first exposure to teenage rebellion, New Wave music, or Nic Cage’s early charm. It played constantly on TV. It felt “cool” in its day. But remove the sepia filter of memory, and what’s left is a film with no teeth, no real message, and only a soundtrack and a few Cage moments worth salvaging.

It’s not bad in the way that, say, Troll 2 is bad — hilariously, infectiously terrible. No, Valley Girl is boring bad. Forgettable bad. It takes a high-concept setup (Romeo and Juliet with valley slang!) and does the bare minimum with it. There’s no comedy sharp enough to sting. No drama deep enough to care. No commentary relevant enough to revisit.


Final Thoughts: Valley Gurl, Bye

Valley Girl may have been a touchstone for a specific generation, but as a film, it barely registers today. It’s not edgy. It’s not particularly funny. It’s not romantic. And it’s certainly not insightful.

It’s a film that spends 90 minutes trying to say something about individuality, nonconformity, and love beyond social labels — but ends up reinforcing every cliché it claims to mock.

Nicolas Cage? A curiosity. Deborah Foreman? Charming, but stranded. The soundtrack? Timeless. But everything else? Totally, like… pass.


Rating: 4/10

+2 for the soundtrack
+1 for Nicolas Cage’s weirdness
+1 for Deborah Foreman’s efforts
-6 for everything else

Post Views: 97

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Real Genius (1985): When Smart Goes Stupid — A Cold Shower for Nerd Cinema
Next Post: Private Obsession (1995): A Sexy Thriller That’s Half Fantasy, Half Nightmare ❯

You may also like

Reviews
Lake Consequence (1993): Skinny-Dipping in a Puddle of Pretentious Trash
June 25, 2025
Reviews
Only You (1992) Review: A Rom-Com Misfire with a Kelly Preston You Don’t Deserve
June 22, 2025
Reviews
Grandview, U.S.A. (1984) — A Quaint, Clunky Misfire With a Wasted Cast
June 15, 2025
Reviews
Werewolf (1987–1988) – Fox’s Atmospheric Howl with Heart
June 15, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dark. Raw. Unfiltered. Independent horror for the real ones. $12.99/month.

CLICK HERE TO BROWSE THE FILMS

Recent Posts

  • Masters of Horror – “Deer Woman” (2005): Antlers, Absurdity, and a Very Strange Boner
  • Susan’s Plan (1998): A Murder Plot So Stupid It Kills the Fun
  • Blues Brothers 2000”: A Sequel Nobody Wanted to the Movie Nobody Should Have Followed
  • The Stupids (1996): A Movie So Dumb, It Gave the VHS Tape Brain Damage
  • Beverly Hills Cop III (1994): Axel Foley Goes to Hellworld (and Takes Us With Him)

Categories

  • Death Wishes
  • Follow The White Rabbit
  • Here Lies Bud
  • Movies
  • Philosophy & Poetry
  • Reviews
  • Scream Queens & Their Directors
  • Uncategorized
  • Zap aka The Wicked
  • Zoe Dies In The End
  • Zombie Chicks

Copyright © 2025 Poché Pictures.

Theme: Oceanly News Dark by ScriptsTown