Skip to content

Poché Pictures

  • Movies
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Wild Horse Hank (1979) Review: Giddy-Up and Get Me Outta Here

Wild Horse Hank (1979) Review: Giddy-Up and Get Me Outta Here

Posted on June 22, 2025 By admin No Comments on Wild Horse Hank (1979) Review: Giddy-Up and Get Me Outta Here
Reviews

Introduction: A Stampede of Boredom

Wild Horse Hank rides in with all the fanfare of a dusty Hallmark Channel rerun someone found in a VCR and said, “Sure, why not?” Marketed as a family-friendly adventure about one girl’s fight to save a herd of wild horses, what you actually get is a 90-minute endurance test where the horses have more personality than any of the humans. It’s like Free Willy on horseback—if Willy just kinda hung around in a pen while the cast muttered wooden dialogue.

The only thing wild about Wild Horse Hank is the audacity to pretend it’s a movie worth remembering. There are after-school specials with more edge. Hell, there are oatmeal commercials with more emotional range.


The Plot: Teenage Girl vs. Capitalism (on Horseback)

The setup is tailor-made for a 70s morality tale. Hank (played by Linda Blair, fresh off Roller Boogie and still trying to wash the glitter off) is a plucky teenager who loves horses more than most people love their own families. When she learns that a group of wild horses are about to be rounded up and sold to a dog food factory—because apparently the 1970s didn’t believe in subtlety—she decides to drive the herd 100 miles to a federal sanctuary. On her own. With no training. And a hat that keeps falling off.

Yes, that’s the plot. A teenage girl hijacks a herd of mustangs to outrun the capitalist meat industry. It’s The Grapes of Wrath if Steinbeck had taken a massive bong hit and written it for The Wonderful World of Disney.


Linda Blair: From Pea Soup to Pony Girl

Let’s give credit where credit’s due: Linda Blair commits. She’s earnest. She’s spirited. She talks to horses like they’re coworkers on a lunch break. But there’s only so much one actress can do when saddled (pun intended) with dialogue that sounds like it was written by a committee of sixth graders trying to win a conservation poster contest.

Watching Blair here is a bit like watching a young star being punished for surviving childhood stardom. “You think you’ve got range?” the casting gods ask. “Here, drive these horses through the Canadian wilderness while reading lines like, ‘You can’t take their freedom!’”


The Horses: Noble Beasts in a Film That Deserves None of Them

The wild horses are majestic, beautiful, and entirely uninterested in being in this movie. There’s a lot of footage of them trotting dramatically in slow motion, intercut with Linda yelling “Come on, boys!” as though she’s leading a PTA meeting rather than a daring rescue.

To the horses’ credit, they all do a great job looking noble and underappreciated—probably because that’s exactly how they felt on set. Somewhere in a stable, one of those horses probably got a better agent than the supporting cast.


The Villains: Cardboard Cowboys with Mustaches of Evil

The antagonists are the kind of one-dimensional ranchers who exist solely to kick dirt, wear aviator sunglasses, and mutter things like, “That girl’s gonna ruin everything.” Their evil plan? Sell horses to the glue factory. Their counterplan? Chase a teenage girl on horseback for 100 miles, like low-stakes Bond villains with a caffeine deficiency.

There’s no real tension here. You never believe for a second they’ll catch her, or that the government is going to side with horse-slaughtering goons. It’s just endless scenes of dudes in trucks saying “damn it!” while Hank trots off into the distance like a motivational poster with legs.


The Direction: Brought to You by Boredom and Budget Cuts

The direction here is flatter than the Alberta prairie. Long, sweeping shots of horses running are meant to be majestic, but they feel more like B-roll footage from a 1970s travel documentary narrated by a hungover park ranger.

The movie pads its runtime with scenes of people riding, looking at maps, camping, and trying to talk to horses as if they’re plotting a revolution. It’s less a movie and more a collection of vaguely scenic horse YouTube videos stitched together by Linda Blair’s determined grimace.


The Message: Horses Are Good. Meat Is Bad. The Government Is…Sometimes Helpful?

Wild Horse Hank is the kind of movie that wants to make a point but gets distracted halfway through by its own soundtrack. It’s a love letter to conservation, sure—but written in crayon and accidentally mailed to a pizza place. The environmental message is admirable, but it’s delivered with all the subtlety of a wild horse trampling your backyard fence.

We get it. Killing animals is bad. But does the solution really have to involve a teenage girl taking the law into her own hands while adult men stand around like baffled extras in a yogurt commercial?


Dark Humor Highlights: When Dull Becomes Absurd

  • Hank names the horses like she’s casting a boy band: “This one’s Lightning! That one’s Old Timer! And this one’s…uh…Shadow!” No one ever tells her this is weird behavior.

  • At one point, she gets chased by the bad guys on ATVs—possibly the slowest vehicular chase ever filmed. It’s less Mad Max, more Mildly Inconvenienced Max.

  • There’s an actual scene where she yells at a horse for “not trusting her,” which is probably how the horse felt about the entire script.

  • The climax involves the federal government showing up in a helicopter like, “Okay, you got us. We’ll save the horses.” What kind of government agency operates on the honor system and teenage moral superiority?


Conclusion: A Wild Ride to Nowhere

Wild Horse Hank is a movie with good intentions and zero horsepower under the hood. It wants to be empowering, inspiring, and heartfelt. Instead, it’s about as thrilling as watching someone rearrange horse saddles for 90 minutes. If you’re a diehard Linda Blair fan or someone who thinks Free Willy needed more dust and fewer stakes, this might work for you. For everyone else, it’s cinematic bran—bland, dry, and only helpful if you’ve got nothing else to digest.

Final Verdict: 1 out of 5 Saddles. One point for the horses. Zero points for the humans.

Post Views: 39

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Roller Boogie (1979): Disco Wheels, Dead Plot, and One Very Grown-Up Linda Blair
Next Post: Ruckus (1980) Review: First Blood… Budget Blood ❯

You may also like

Reviews
10 to Midnight (1983): Charles Bronson vs. Naked Knife Guy – And Somehow They Both Lose
June 22, 2025
Reviews
Assassination (1987): Charles Bronson Takes a Nap With a Gun
June 28, 2025
Reviews
Bloody Birthday (1981) – Eerie Premise, Uneven Execution, Occasional Scares
June 15, 2025
Reviews
The Brutalist – The Worst Movie Ever?
May 20, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dark. Raw. Unfiltered. Independent horror for the real ones. $12.99/month.

CLICK HERE TO BROWSE THE FILMS

Recent Posts

  • Masters of Horror – “Deer Woman” (2005): Antlers, Absurdity, and a Very Strange Boner
  • Susan’s Plan (1998): A Murder Plot So Stupid It Kills the Fun
  • Blues Brothers 2000”: A Sequel Nobody Wanted to the Movie Nobody Should Have Followed
  • The Stupids (1996): A Movie So Dumb, It Gave the VHS Tape Brain Damage
  • Beverly Hills Cop III (1994): Axel Foley Goes to Hellworld (and Takes Us With Him)

Categories

  • Death Wishes
  • Follow The White Rabbit
  • Here Lies Bud
  • Movies
  • Philosophy & Poetry
  • Reviews
  • Scream Queens & Their Directors
  • Uncategorized
  • Zap aka The Wicked
  • Zoe Dies In The End
  • Zombie Chicks

Copyright © 2025 Poché Pictures.

Theme: Oceanly News Dark by ScriptsTown