Blood and Roses should have been a bloody bouquetâwhat we got instead was a wilted corsage of perfume-scented nonsense and moth-eaten melodrama. Roger Vadimâs 1960 erotic horror misfire adapts Sheridan Le Fanuâs sapphic vampire classic Carmilla with all the sensual tension of a limp baguette and about as much horror as a Dior runway show. This film is less fangs and fear than it is frocks and fumbling, and while that might titillate some, genre fans craving actual horror or even a pulse will find themselves pounding nails into the coffin just to keep themselves awake.
â ïž THE âPLOTâ: A Ghost of a Story
The skeletal remains of Carmilla are hereâsort ofâthough theyâve been hastily buried under layers of chiffon, Technicolor smog, and existential ennui. Set in 1960s Italy (because apparently nothing screams gothic horror like post-war espresso bars), the story centers on Carmilla, a pouty aristocrat floating through Hadrianâs Villa in a satin fog of jealousy, repression, and cheekbone contouring.
Carmilla, clearly smoldering with some deeply unresolved feelings for her gal pal Georgia (played by Elsa Martinelli, who gives all the emotional range of a wax figure at a fashion museum), becomes unhinged when Georgia gets engaged to Carmillaâs cousin Leopoldo (Mel Ferrer, who appears to be sleepwalking through the role while mentally cashing his paycheck).
A masquerade ball leads to a fireworks accidentâbecause thatâs how vampire lore works now?âwhich awakens the spirit of Carmillaâs vampiric ancestor. Our modern Carmilla wanders into a conveniently exposed World War II munitions crater, finds her ancestorâs crypt (as you do), and then returns to the villa acting all… well, French. You know: listless, smoldery, occasionally murderous. Victims pile up. Georgia clutches her pearls. And the audience checks their watches.
đŠ VADIMâS VAMPIRE: CARMILLA, REDUCED TO A PERFUME AD
If Carl Theodor Dreyerâs Vampyr was an artful sĂ©ance, Blood and Roses is a moody Instagram filter applied to a bar napkin. Roger Vadimâpreviously known for turning Brigitte Bardot into an international sex kittenâtries to do for vampires what he did for beach bunnies: make them chic. Unfortunately, he also makes them insufferably boring.
Annette Vadim (his then-wife, because of course nepotism doesnât die) plays Carmilla like sheâs perpetually posing for a Chanel ad: lips parted, eyes glazed, expression unreadable. Thereâs no menace, no ache, no danger. Sheâs a specter with perfect posture and zero dramatic stakes. Carmillaâs transition from pouty debutante to bloodsucking monster (or is she just emotionally unstable?) is delivered with the urgency of someone deciding between silk or satin for her next gown.
Thereâs one potentially interesting momentâa dream sequence in which Carmilla chases Georgia through mist and mirrorâbut Vadim shoots it like a Vogue photo spread. Itâs haunting in the way a commercial for Dior Poison might be, if you squint and drink absinthe. A whole lot of visual suggestion, and absolutely no bite.
đ§ DIALOGUE TO DIE (OF BOREDOM) FOR
Then thereâs the script, which plays like a Monty Python sketch on quaaludes. The dialogue is stilted, as though the actors learned their lines phonetically during a sĂ©ance. Maybe they didâVadim had his cast shoot scenes in both French and English, which might explain why no one seems to know what emotion theyâre supposed to be feeling. The dubbing is a crime against both linguistics and atmosphere. Strident voices bark out âemotionalâ lines while the actorsâ faces remain slack and unmoved, like mannequins lip-syncing to soap operas from another dimension.
Even the narrator sounds bored, as though heâs apologizing for the film’s existence while narrating it. The voiceover drops exposition like a professor phoning in his syllabus, and it manages to drain the few scenes that almost build tension.
đ THE COSTUMES: CURTAINS, DRAPES, AND COFFINS
Credit where itâs due: Blood and Roses is pretty. Claude Renoirâs Technicolor cinematography gives everything a rich, painterly sheen, and the locationsâshot around Hadrianâs Villaâare genuinely gorgeous. But the film is all sizzle and no stake. Itâs like decorating a hearse with Swarovski crystals: youâre still on your way to a burial, but now itâs fashionable.
Vadim substitutes horror for haute couture. Every scene is costumed to the nines, and yet somehow it all feels lifeless. The masquerade ball should be a visual feast of dread, but it plays more like a masquerade snooze, with the camera lingering on masks and gowns like a jealous lover. The sets are opulent, yesâbut opulence canât hide the emptiness at the heart of this film.
đ·ïž THE SAPPHIC SUBTEXT: A WHISPER IN A WIND TUNNEL
Le Fanuâs original Carmilla is dripping with sensual tension and psychological horror. Itâs a trailblazer of queer gothic literature. Vadim, ever the opportunist, exploits the queer subtext without ever doing the work to make it real. The eroticism here is mostly suggested via longing stares and breathy voiceovers. Itâs faux transgressive: all tease, no climax. Georgia and Carmillaâs relationship could have been a powder keg of repression and unspoken desireâbut Vadim reduces it to a soft-focus perfume commercial with vampire cosplay.
The lesbian lilt noted in a contemporary gay magazine review is there, sure, but itâs half-baked and handled with such coyness it feels almost insulting. Rather than exploring female desire with any depth, Vadim gives us a whisper of innuendo buried beneath 10 pounds of tulle and trauma.
đ§ FINAL STAKES: A TOOTHLESS TRAGEDY
Blood and Roses isnât scary. It isnât sexy. It isnât even especially entertaining. Itâs a confused, overdesigned relic of a director trying to be both a provocateur and an aesthete, but managing to be neither. Vadim wants to horrify us with eleganceâbut all he manages to do is lull us to sleep with set dressing.
Itâs hard to overstate how frustrating this film is for fans of Carmilla, lesbian vampire lore, or just atmospheric horror. All the ingredients are hereâbeautiful setting, moody lighting, a rich literary sourceâbut Vadim drains them of vitality like a vampire draining a victim through a paper straw.
This is not horror. This is haute horror, declawed and defanged, wrapped in a velvet shroud and buried under its own pretensions. Itâs a ghost of a movie, wandering the fog-shrouded cemetery of squandered potential.
â Rating: 1 out of 5 Arterial Sprays
For completionists and costume fetishists only. Everyone elseâdrive a stake through this one and move on to something with actual fangs. đ©ž



