Skip to content

Poché Pictures

  • Movies
  • YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Cocaine Shark (2023): Proof That Titles Can Be Lies, Crimes, and Cruel Jokes

Cocaine Shark (2023): Proof That Titles Can Be Lies, Crimes, and Cruel Jokes

Posted on November 10, 2025 By admin No Comments on Cocaine Shark (2023): Proof That Titles Can Be Lies, Crimes, and Cruel Jokes
Reviews

The Movie That Promised Sharks on Cocaine but Delivered None of the Above

Every now and then, cinema blesses us with a film so bad it becomes a spiritual experience. Cocaine Shark is not one of those films. It skips the so-bad-it’s-good sweet spot and dives face-first into the so-bad-it’s-existential category. This is a movie that dares to ask the question: What if sharks could do cocaine?—and then answers, “Actually, what if there were no sharks, no cocaine, and no plot instead?”

Directed by Mark Polonia (a man who treats film production like speed dating—fast, cheap, and everyone leaves disappointed), Cocaine Shark is the cinematic equivalent of a knockoff action figure labeled “Fast Fish: The Illegal Ocean.” It was cynically rebranded from its original title, Kanizame Shakurabu (roughly, “Crab Shark Club”), to ride the high of Cocaine Bear’s viral success. Unfortunately, the only thing this movie rides is the audience’s patience straight into the Mariana Trench.


The Premise: Shark Week on Methadone

The story—if you can call it that—centers on a drug lord who develops a new narcotic called HT25, a chemical derived from shark brains. Now, that sounds promisingly insane, like a fever dream written by a stoned marine biologist. But don’t get too excited. The “sharks” in question spend the entire movie either offscreen, on blurry TV monitors, or represented by someone shaking an action figure near the camera.

After a lab explosion releases these “mutated creatures,” they begin “wreaking havoc.” That’s the official synopsis, anyway. In practice, “wreaking havoc” translates to about four minutes of stock footage, two inflatable fins, and a blurry jump cut to someone screaming in another room.

What’s left is an hour and ten minutes of people standing in empty warehouses delivering lines like, “We’ve got to stop the sharks before it’s too late!” into the void—lines that would be infinitely more convincing if any sharks, or even evidence of a nearby aquarium, were present.


Characters: Aquarium Extras Anonymous

Let’s talk about the cast—though “cast” might be generous. It’s more like a collection of confused volunteers trapped in a student film about narco marine life.

  • Samantha Coolidge as Meagan — the de facto lead, though it’s unclear what she actually does. She’s introduced as a scientist, then spends most of her screen time staring into space like she just remembered she left the oven on.

  • Ryan Dalton as Fuente — the supposed drug lord, though he looks more like a guy who got lost on his way to a vape convention. He threatens people a lot and says “HT25” like it’s a brand of multivitamins.

  • Jeff Kirkendall as Captain Dillon — a man whose entire character arc is wearing a Hawaiian shirt and narrating exposition like he’s trying to stay awake while doing it.

  • Natalie and Titus Himmelberger as the other two people in the room — because that’s all they are. Every time they appear, you think, Oh good, new characters, but no—they just repeat the same dialogue loop from earlier, like NPCs stuck in a glitch.

Every scene feels like a hostage video shot in an abandoned garage. You can practically hear the actors’ inner monologues whispering, Please let this be over. Please let the check clear.


Special Effects: A Shark Tale Told by a Blender

Ah yes, the sharks. The stars of the show. The titular apex predators on designer drugs. Except—spoiler alert—they never actually appear.

What we get instead are:

  • A handful of rubber fish puppets waving around in a dark aquarium tank.

  • Some recycled CGI from what looks like a 2002 screensaver.

  • A few seconds of footage of a crab, because apparently “Kanizame” means “crab shark,” and the filmmakers decided to take that literally.

At one point, a character screams, “It’s coming right for us!” while the camera shakes violently at a wall. There’s no creature, no water, and no context. It’s like watching a found-footage horror film directed by a Roomba.

Even the blood looks like strawberry Kool-Aid mixed with regret. Every kill scene is cut so quickly that you’ll wonder if the editor was paid by the transition.


The Direction: A Sharknado of Incompetence

Mark Polonia is a cult filmmaker known for pumping out low-budget monster movies with names like Sharkenstein and Land Shark. But Cocaine Shark manages to make even those look like Citizen Kane.

It’s clear that the movie was filmed in whatever abandoned warehouse the crew could sneak into without getting arrested. The lighting ranges from “barely visible” to “nuclear apocalypse.” Scenes often end mid-sentence, possibly because someone tripped over the power cord.

There are multiple moments where you can see the actors waiting for their cue, staring awkwardly at each other until someone finally blurts out, “We have to stop the drug!” The pacing is so glacial that you’ll start rooting for global warming to speed things up.


The Soundtrack: GarageBand’s Greatest Misses

The music is… something. Imagine if a free YouTube stock library had a nervous breakdown. Random synth stings blare at inappropriate moments, and the sound mix is so off that dialogue alternates between whisper-quiet and eardrum-shattering. At one point, an explosion happens offscreen, accompanied by a sound effect that could have been lifted from a cartoon toaster.

You could honestly mute the film and play Baby Shark on loop and it would make more thematic sense.


The Title: False Advertising, or Performance Art?

Let’s address the elephant—or rather, the shark—in the room. There is no cocaine. There are no sharks. The title Cocaine Shark is a lie so bold it circles back to genius. It’s like naming your restaurant “Steakhouse” and serving only yogurt.

The drug in question, HT25, is never described, shown, or explained. Nobody snorts it, injects it, or even sneezes near it. The closest thing we get to “cocaine” is one guy who talks a little too fast, which, given the script, might just be panic.

It’s clear the producers saw Cocaine Bear trending and said, “We can do that for $200 and a dream.” They were wrong. What we got isn’t a movie—it’s a legally distinct sigh of disappointment.


The “Horror”: Fear of Empty Rooms

There’s no tension, no build-up, and certainly no fear. The movie’s scariest feature is its runtime. When your horror film’s biggest threat is the possibility of boredom-induced death, it’s time to reevaluate your career.

The dialogue tries to maintain suspense with lines like, “It’s mutating again!” or “We have to contain it!”—which would be thrilling if anything were actually mutating or being contained. Most of the horror happens offscreen, probably because even the monsters refused to show up.


The Ending: Or, How to End a Movie Without One

Eventually, there’s an explosion, a brief flash of red light, and someone yells “It’s over!” And that’s it. Roll credits. No resolution, no explanation, no sharks. Just a sense of profound emptiness and the vague feeling you’ve been scammed.

The end credits last longer than some of the scenes. You half expect a post-credits stinger revealing that Cocaine Shark 2will never, ever happen—and for once, that would be merciful.


Final Verdict: Just Say No

Cocaine Shark is a movie so profoundly misleading that it deserves to be studied by future generations of con artists. It’s not just a bad film—it’s an anti-film, a cinematic black hole where logic, talent, and budget all go to die.

It’s the kind of experience that makes you question your life choices, your relationship with media, and possibly your sanity. By the end, you’ll wish you were on cocaine just to stay awake.

Rating: 1/10 — The only thing this movie snorted was your time. There are no sharks, no drugs, and no reason to press play.


Post Views: 190

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Brooklyn 45 (2023): A Séance So Boring the Dead Would Rather Stay Dead
Next Post: The Devil’s Left Hand (2023): When the Past, Demons, and a Housewarming Party All Go Horribly Right ❯

You may also like

Reviews
The Honeymoon Phase
November 8, 2025
Reviews
Death Ship (1980) – The Love Boat, Now With Nazis
August 13, 2025
Reviews
Spring (2014): Love in the Time of Tentacles
October 25, 2025
Reviews
Killer Crocodile (1989) – Review Jaws, But If It Lived in a Radioactive Swamp and Looked Like a Pool Toy
August 26, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dark. Raw. Unfiltered. Independent horror for the real ones. $12.99/month.

CLICK HERE TO BROWSE THE FILMS

Recent Posts

  • Traci Lords – The Girl Who Wouldn’t Stay Buried
  • Rhonda Fleming — The Queen of Technicolor
  • Ethel Fleming — The Surf Girl Who Wouldn’t Drown
  • Alice Fleming — Grandeur in the Margins of the Frame
  • Maureen Flannigan — The Girl Who Could Freeze Time and Then Kept Moving

Categories

  • Behind The Scenes
  • Character Actors
  • Death Wishes
  • Follow The White Rabbit
  • Here Lies Bud
  • Hollywood "News"
  • Movies
  • Old Time Wrestlers
  • Philosophy & Poetry
  • Present Day Wrestlers (Male)
  • Pro Wrestling History & News
  • Reviews
  • Scream Queens & Their Directors
  • Uncategorized
  • Women's Wrestling
  • Wrestling News
  • Zap aka The Wicked
  • Zoe Dies In The End
  • Zombie Chicks

Copyright © 2025 Poché Pictures. Image Disclaimer: Some images on this website may be AI-generated artistic interpretations used for editorial purposes. Real photographs taken by Poche Pictures or collaborating photographers are clearly identifiable and used with permission.

Theme: Oceanly News Dark by ScriptsTown