Skip to content

Poché Pictures

  • Movies
  • YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • MURDER 101 (2014): THE HORROR CLASS NOBODY PASSED

MURDER 101 (2014): THE HORROR CLASS NOBODY PASSED

Posted on October 25, 2025 By admin No Comments on MURDER 101 (2014): THE HORROR CLASS NOBODY PASSED
Reviews

A Course in Murder, Mediocrity, and Misused Tom Sizemore

If you’ve ever wondered what would happen if a true-crime podcast was turned into a student film and then accidentally left in the microwave, Murder 101 has your answer. Directed by Michael Phillip Edwards and starring the perpetually exasperated Tom Sizemore, this 2014 direct-to-DVD horror-thriller promises a “twisted game of cat and mouse” — and delivers a game of Where’s the Plot? instead.

It’s the kind of film that wants to make you question morality, justice, and human nature, but instead makes you question who approved this script and why the lighting looks like it was powered by a dying lava lamp.


Plot: Murder, She Barely Wrote

The story follows Fiona (Paige LaPierre), a brilliant law student who also happens to be the kind of “brilliant” who investigates serial killings in her spare time while still somehow missing every obvious clue in front of her. Fiona enrolls in a criminology class taught by the enigmatic Professor Mark Sloan (Randy Irwin), whose teaching style seems to consist of vague lectures about “the mind of a killer” and awkwardly intense staring.

But Fiona’s academic dreams are cut short when a series of gruesome murders rock the campus. Each death is more “random” than the last, at least until Fiona realizes that — plot twist! — the victims all have some connection to her past. This shocking revelation is delivered with the subtlety of a car alarm in a library.

Rather than doing what any rational person would — calling the police and leaving town — Fiona decides to play amateur detective. Because nothing says “law school excellence” like interfering with a homicide investigation.

Meanwhile, Detective Caterson (Sheldon F. Robins) is on the case, bringing all the gravitas of a local community-theater version of CSI: Kalamazoo. And then there’s Tom Sizemore as FBI Agent Ridley, whose scenes feel like they were filmed in a single afternoon between court dates. Sizemore looks exhausted, and who can blame him? He’s the only one who seems aware that he’s in a bad movie.

As the body count rises and the logic sinks, Fiona starts to suspect that the killer might be someone she knows — maybe a classmate, maybe her professor, maybe even herself (cue dramatic zoom). The film desperately wants to be a psychological thriller, but it’s more like watching a term paper that didn’t cite any sources.


Characters: Dead Meat and Dialogue Drones

Let’s talk about our heroine, Fiona. She’s supposed to be smart, driven, and fearless — but mostly comes across as the kind of person who would follow a serial killer into a dark alley because she “just wants to talk.” Paige LaPierre gives her best effort, but the script gives her all the emotional depth of a damp file folder.

Professor Sloan is your standard issue “mysterious academic with creepy undertones.” He looks like he spends his weekends writing manifestos in cursive. His relationship with Fiona is supposed to be intellectually charged, but it’s mostly just uncomfortable.

Detective Caterson, meanwhile, is less “hard-boiled cop” and more “guy who keeps losing his reading glasses.” His investigation techniques involve a lot of sighing, looking at evidence upside down, and announcing “We’ve got a pattern here” every twenty minutes.

And then there’s Tom Sizemore. Oh, Tom. You once stood shoulder-to-shoulder with De Niro and Pacino, and now you’re stuck in a movie where the scariest thing is the continuity editing. His Agent Ridley appears intermittently, like a spirit haunting a better film. You can practically hear him muttering “Paycheck, paycheck, paycheck” under his breath.

The supporting cast is a grab bag of archetypes: the jealous friend, the suspicious boyfriend, the too-friendly professor’s assistant, and that one character who only exists to die in the second act so Fiona can look traumatized.


Tone: Law & Order Meets Lifetime Movie After a Head Injury

Murder 101 can’t decide what it wants to be. Some scenes aim for gritty realism, others feel like rejected clips from Pretty Little Liars, and a few could double as parodies if they weren’t so painfully sincere.

The cinematography is so flat it makes community college lecture halls look atmospheric. Every scene is drenched in that telltale straight-to-video gloss, where everything looks simultaneously overlit and underdeveloped.

The music is equally confused — tense strings for the murder scenes, cheap synths for the “sexy” parts, and an occasional jazz riff that sounds like it wandered in from an entirely different movie.

And then there’s the dialogue. Imagine if ChatGPT was trained exclusively on police procedural clichés and motivational posters, and you’ll get a sense of the writing. Lines like “Justice is a double-edged sword” and “Sometimes the law can’t protect us from ourselves” are delivered with complete sincerity, as if they mean something profound instead of sounding like a rejected NCIS monologue.


The Horror: Death by Monotony

For a film that advertises itself as a “horror thriller,” Murder 101 is shockingly devoid of both horror and thrills. The murders themselves are filmed offscreen, implied through reaction shots and ominous music — which would be fine if the aftermath wasn’t just someone whispering, “She’s dead” over a cup of lukewarm coffee.

There’s no suspense, no mystery, no tension. Even the killer’s eventual reveal lands with the emotional weight of a missed text message. It’s a twist that tries to be shocking but instead makes you say, “Oh, okay. Sure. Why not.”

The gore is minimal, likely due to the film’s budget, which I assume was about $50 and a Groupon for fake blood. Most of the scares come from jump cuts and the realization that you still have half the movie left to go.


Editing and Direction: The Real Crime Scene

Michael Phillip Edwards directs with all the enthusiasm of a man grading papers he didn’t assign. The pacing is uneven — sometimes dragging slower than a tortoise in molasses, other times cutting so abruptly you wonder if you blacked out.

The editing deserves special recognition for sheer incompetence. Scenes fade in and out randomly, continuity is a distant dream, and reaction shots linger long enough for you to consider your own life choices.

At one point, the film cuts from a bloody crime scene to a cheerful coffee shop without warning, as if the editor accidentally shuffled the timeline and said, “Eh, close enough.”


The Theme: Revenge, Regret, and Really Bad Writing

Murder 101 tries to explore deep psychological themes — trauma, guilt, the inheritance of violence — but it has all the insight of a first-year philosophy student discovering Nietzsche. Every revelation feels forced, every emotional beat artificial.

The movie’s idea of character development is showing Fiona staring out a window while sad piano music plays. Her entire arc could be summed up as: “Was sad. Investigated murder. Still sad.”

Even the backstory about her father’s death, which should add depth, feels tacked on. It’s as if the writers realized halfway through that they needed motivation and scribbled one in the margins.


The Ending: Plot Twist, Meet Plot Dump

When the killer is finally revealed, it’s not so much a twist as a mild inconvenience. The explanation arrives via a clunky exposition dump that manages to be both predictable and confusing. It’s the cinematic equivalent of a law exam where everyone fails, including the professor.

The final scene tries for poetic ambiguity — Fiona staring into the distance, contemplating her fate — but by that point, you’ll be contemplating whether it’s too late to demand a refund from Redbox.


Final Thoughts: Case Closed, Viewer Traumitized

Murder 101 isn’t just a bad movie; it’s a cautionary tale about what happens when ambition meets a $12 lunch budget. It wants to be Silence of the Lambs but ends up as Whispers of the Mildly Annoyed.

It’s not suspenseful, not scary, and not particularly coherent. Even Tom Sizemore looks like he’s filing for cinematic asylum.

The real mystery isn’t who the killer is — it’s how this movie ever made it out of editing alive.


Final Verdict:
⭐️ out of 5.
A lifeless, laughless thriller where the biggest crime is against storytelling itself. Take my advice: skip class. There’s no extra credit in Murder 101 — only detention for your soul.


Post Views: 205

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: MONSTERS: DARK CONTINENT (2014): WAR IS HELL, AND SO IS THIS MOVIE
Next Post: OUT OF THE DARK (2014): GHOSTS, MERCURY, AND A PAPER MILL OF PAIN ❯

You may also like

Reviews
Carnifex
November 10, 2025
Reviews
“The Helpers” (2012): No Vacancy for Logic, Talent, or Dignity
October 18, 2025
Reviews
THE SILENT HOUSE (2010) — SCREAMING INTO THE DARKNESS, ONE LONG TAKE AT A TIME
October 15, 2025
Reviews
Zone of the Dead (2009): When the Apocalypse Looks Like a Weekend in Belgrade
October 13, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dark. Raw. Unfiltered. Independent horror for the real ones. $12.99/month.

CLICK HERE TO BROWSE THE FILMS

Recent Posts

  • Traci Lords – The Girl Who Wouldn’t Stay Buried
  • Rhonda Fleming — The Queen of Technicolor
  • Ethel Fleming — The Surf Girl Who Wouldn’t Drown
  • Alice Fleming — Grandeur in the Margins of the Frame
  • Maureen Flannigan — The Girl Who Could Freeze Time and Then Kept Moving

Categories

  • Behind The Scenes
  • Character Actors
  • Death Wishes
  • Follow The White Rabbit
  • Hollywood "News"
  • Last Night Alive
  • Movies
  • Old Time Wrestlers
  • Philosophy & Poetry
  • Present Day Wrestlers (Male)
  • Pro Wrestling History & News
  • Reviews
  • Scream Queens & Their Directors
  • Uncategorized
  • Women's Wrestling
  • Wrestling News
  • Zap aka The Wicked
  • Zoe Dies In The End
  • Zombie Chicks

Copyright © 2025 Poché Pictures. Image Disclaimer: Some images on this website may be AI-generated artistic interpretations used for editorial purposes. Real photographs taken by Poche Pictures or collaborating photographers are clearly identifiable and used with permission.

Theme: Oceanly News Dark by ScriptsTown